For those who want to know my reasons for changing back, here's what I said in the discussion on G+:
My reasons for wanting to switch back to my old template:
1. I think the alternate Dynamic Views button is too prominent. They're neat, but unnecessary and confusing.
2. Commenting only really works if you're logged into your (Google, Yahoo etc) account before you start typing the comment. Otherwise it sends you to an old-style Blogger comment page, and doesn't bring the comment with it (hitting back allows you to find the comment again).
3. "Below the fold" articles don't open up at all in the magazine layout. see:http://glendonmellow.blogspot.com/2011/10/illustration-blogging-why-its-essential.html
4. I liked having some of my widgets/gadgets in the sidebar and footer, though I think this exercise in Dynamic Views has made me realize I could lose tons of them and not care. Gadgets are apparently a work-in-progress for Blogger and will be coming back.
5. It's working in every view I have tested: Safari, Chrome and Firefox. My iPhone picks up the mobile template and doesn't read Dynamic Views. But it sounds like some people are having problems with it.
6. The HTML5 animations of transitions are sometimes choppy, and my internet connection is pretty damn good.
Thanks to everyone who commented and weighted in on Twitter, G+ and here on the blog. I learned how many gadgets I miss and how many I don't. Changes haven't ended, but I thinking taking a step back after plunging forward is good for the design.
Changes haven't ended. After all, when The Flying Trilobite turns 5 in a few months, it'll need a facelift.
- - - - - - - -
Original artwork on The Flying Trilobite Copyright to Glendon Mellow
under Creative Commons Licence.
--> Find me on Symbiartic, the art+science blog on the new Scientific American Blog Network!